 |
White House wants to cap USDA 'green' payment plan
|
|
Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version
|
|
USA: February 4, 2003
|
WASHINGTON - The new federal Conservation Security Program, created to reward farmers for soil, water and wildlife stewardship, would be limited to $2 billion over the next decade under a Bush administration proposal released yesterday.
|
Budget documents issued by the U.S. Agriculture Department said legislation would be offered to "cap spending on this program at $2 billion over 10 years, 2003 through 2012."Hailed as a way to funnel "green" payments to growers, the Conservation Security Program has faced a difficult birth, although it was part of the 2002 farm subsidy law. Some lawmakers have tried to limit it to a one-state pilot this year rather than a nationwide program. The cost of the program initially was estimated at $2 billion through 2011, most coming after the 2007 expiration of the farm law. But more recent estimates put the cost at $9 billion, if the Conservation Security Program is considered an entitlement, like crop subsidies. A cap would hold spending at the initially estimated level, but also could constrain the size of the program. Backers foresaw a system of increasingly larger payments to growers based on how much work they did to make soil, water and wildlife preservation a part of their operations. Maximum payment would be $50,000 a year to a farmer.
|
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
|
| ENVIRONMENTAL NEWS SEARCH |
|
Enter your keywords to search our news archive by subject. Type "Greenpeace", for example, into the box below and you will be given a listing of all Planet Ark's news and images relating to Greenpeace.
|
|
Alternatively, why not check out our news archive on an issue by issue basis? Select a topic from the list below to learn everything you need to know about the topics contained within this search engine.
|
|
© 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
|
|
|