Subscribe to daily environment news





 

Click for news Click for pictures
National Tree Day

Planet Ark Home


Brazil soy sector ignores gov't decree on GM soy
Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version

BRAZIL: May 9, 2003


SAO PAULO, Brazil - Over one month after the government decreed that all genetically modified soy must carry consumer warning labels, Brazil's soy industry is going about business as usual without labeling, sector leaders said.


Provisional measure 113 published on March 26 requires all soybeans and soy products with more than 1 percent GM content to bear a label saying so. Producers with conventional crops who wish to sell them as such must test the soy and obtain GM-free certificates, according to measure 113.

But so far, producers, cooperatives and traders are buying and selling without any GM labels or any increase in GM-free certificates.

Brazil has banned the commercial use of GM crops and foods since 1998, but a black market in GM soy has thrived in the south as producers smuggle Monsanto Roundup Ready GM soy from Argentina and Paraguay. Measure 113 provides amnesty for GM producers to sell their soy until Jan. 2004.

"For now, the measure has not altered anything in the commercial process of the cooperatives," said Rui Polidoro, president of the Rio Grande do Sul Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives (Fecoagro), which has seen no labeling or increase in segregation of soybeans in the No. 3 soy producer state.

"The volume of (conventional soy) certified is minimum," said Polidoro. "It makes the volume of transgenic soy in the state look much larger than it really is."

Soy traders say 85 percent of the state's 8 million tonnes crop has been harvested and Fecoagro believes 50 to 60 percent of it is genetically altered.

The soy sector in No. 2 producer Parana, which has nearly completed its harvest, has also ignored the measure.

"We're observing still no concern about the labeling," said Nelson Costa at the state Cooperatives Organization (Ocepar).

Costa said the absence of labeling was due to very little planting of GM by state producers respecting the ban.

NO INTEREST IN GM-FREE

Cooperatives said there was no apparent increase in interest in certifying soy as GM-free, either, despite 113.

Antonio Sartori, owner of the Rio Grande do Sul brokerage Brasoja, said nobody was certifying crops as non-transgenic because there was no financial compensation.

"The buyer doesn't want to know, so the producer prefers to deliver the soy as transgenic and ready," said Sartori.

Most of the main cooperatives in Rio Grande do Sul and Parana reported that they were receiving soy without any indication as to whether it is transgenic or not.


Story by Inae Riveras


REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

Reuters



© 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
top

 
9 MAY 2003
ENVIRONMENT
NEWS

AUSTRALIA:
Australia GM canola hopes fade with state ban

BELGIUM:
EU drafts tough new chemicals safety test rules

BRAZIL:
Brazil soy sector ignores gov't decree on GM soy

ECUADOR:
Ecuador Indians sue Texaco over polluted water

GERMANY:
Adidas silent on US kangaroo lawsuit, shares wilt

JAPAN:
Japan's Hiranuma says power shortage possible

SOUTH AFRICA:
South Africa seeks to dump plastic "national flower"

UK:
Superweed-eating beetles save Benin millions

UK:
Genetic fault linked to insecticide resistance

UK:
Tree-saving electronic paper comes a step closer

UK:
UK scientists challenge greens over GM food claims

USA:
Detroit automakers under fire in new ad campaign

USA:
West Hollywood's cats get law to keep claws

USA:
California group sues Adidas over kangaroo leather

USA:
US officials drop controversial aging calculation

USA:
NRC plans safety revisions for US nuke plants

USA:
GM to test fuel cells to power Dow Chemical plant

VENEZUELA:
FEATURE - Venezuela fights to save endangered Arrau turtle



previous day
today's news
next day