 |
Underwear in Public Not Indecent, Court Says
|
|
Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version
|
|
USA: August 31, 2004
|
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. - Wearing underwear and nothing else in public does not constitute indecency, a Massachusetts court declared as it tossed out charges against six animal rights protesters.
|
Members of the group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals were arrested and charged with indecency and disturbing the peace after a chilly rally in March near Harvard University where they stripped to their skivvies and staged a nearly naked pillow fight to protest against fur. Six months and three court dates later, a Cambridge, Massachusetts, judge threw out the indecency charges against all six PETA members. All but one of the protesters - PETA Vice President Dan Mathews - were also cleared of disturbing the peace. Mathews was ordered to pay a $300 fine. Mathews told Reuters he was relieved that the indecent exposure charges were dismissed, noting that a conviction on such a charge would have forced him and the other demonstrators to register as sex offenders in Massachusetts.
|
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
|
© 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
|
|
|
|
|
|