Subscribe to daily environment news





 

Click for news Click for pictures
National Tree Day

Planet Ark Home


Nuclear Power No Sure Cure for Climate Ills - Groups
Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version

US: May 3, 2007


WASHINGTON - Nuclear energy may not live up to its promise as the solution for global warming, according to separate reports released this week by an environmental group and an independent think tank.


US President George W. Bush and others tout nuclear power as a way to boost electricity supplies without using coal, natural gas or other carbon-based energy sources that can contribute to global warming.

"The truth of the matter is, if people really want to solve the issue of greenhouse gases, civilian nuclear power, powering our energy grids by nuclear power is the best alternative available," Bush said last week.

The United Nations-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is expected to recommend using nuclear power to curb greenhouse gases in a report to be released Friday.

Some environmentalists have said that global warming is such a serious threat that nuclear power should be reconsidered, in part because it can help phase out coal, which is the dirtiest fossil fuel.

The environmental advocacy group Greenpeace, though, said on Wednesday that building new US nuclear power plants is too costly and would take too long to replace fossil fuels, even with billions of dollars' worth of financial subsidies laced through a 2005 energy bill.

"Nuclear power is an expensive and dangerous distraction from real climate solutions," said Jim Riccio, a nuclear policy analyst for Greenpeace.

The report pointed to current construction of a new generator in Finland that is 18 months behind schedule and US$1 billion over budget. It also found that construction of a new nuclear plant takes about seven years on average.

Similarly, the Council on Foreign Relations, a Washington think tank, says it is almost impossible to build enough nuclear power plants to arrest the rise in earth temperatures. It would be hard for the nuclear industry to procure large amounts of reactor-grade construction materials and hire enough trained workers, the report said.

"Given the current US energy sources and patterns of use, nuclear energy alone does not provide a solution for at least the next few decades for significantly reducing the US contribution to global warming," wrote Charles Ferguson, the council's science and technology fellow.

To hold global carbon dioxide emissions at year 2000's levels, the world would need between 1,900 and 3,300 gigawatts of nuclear capacity by 2050, Ferguson wrote in the report, which was also sponsored by Washington and Lee University. The typical nuclear reactor produces about one gigawatt, or 1,000 megawatts, of power output. About one new reactor would have to come on line each week over the next four decades, he wrote.

Some 103 reactors currently generate about 20 percent of US electricity. The Energy Department said that in 2004 the electricity sector kept 142 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from entering the air by using nuclear power.

The Nuclear Energy Institute, which lobbies for big nuclear operators, said nuclear power plants are vital for the future.

"It's vital that we take full advantage of reliable, affordable nuclear energy and its valuable environmental attributes," said Frank Bowman, the group's president.


Story by Lisa Lambert


REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

Reuters



© 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
top

 
3 MAY 2007
ENVIRONMENT
NEWS

AUSTRALIA:
Australian Farmers Wrestle Dingo Threat

AUSTRALIA:
Australia Demands "New Kyoto" in Place of "Old"

CHINA:
Deep Tremors May Hold Key to Predicting Big Quakes

CHINA:
Forest Fire Reignites in Northeast China Mountains

FRANCE:
France Records Hottest April Since 1950

GERMANY:
Carbon Market Trebled in 2006 - World Bank

JAPAN:
Battle Brews Over Japan's Push for Ethanol Gasoline

MEXICO:
Jeans Firms Pollute Mexican City With Blue Dye

NORWAY:
Poor Nations Brake Greenhouse Gas Rise - UN Draft

SINGAPORE:
Asia Struggles to Stop Relentless "Pollution Calendar"

THAILAND:
It's Survival of the Toughest at UN Climate Talks

THAILAND:
Bangkok Faces Flooded Future, Expert Says

UK:
Zero-Carbon UK Houses 1/8th Dearer to Build - Report

UK:
Buyer Beware, Carbon Cuts Not Always Real

UK:
US, European Climate Change Tactics Compatible

UK:
Carbon Tax or Carbon Market? The Jury is Out

UK:
Small, Unexciting Steps Can Make Big Climate Leap

UK:
Keen to be Green -- But at What Cost?

UK:
The Pros and Cons of Going Green in the Home

US:
US Corporate Climate Plan May Need Carbon Tax Cues

US:
Nuclear Power No Sure Cure for Climate Ills - Groups

US:
US-Based Index Allows Bets on Global Warming Fight

US:
US Environment Satellites In Jeopardy - Scientists



previous day
today's news
next day


This site developed by Frontline, and managed by Planet Ark using RPM-NT.

Site designed by Jon Dee @ Planet Ark.

Radiant