Subscribe to daily environment news





 

Click for news Click for pictures
National Tree Day

Planet Ark Home


US, European Climate Change Tactics Compatible
Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version

UK: May 3, 2007


LONDON - An EU-US stalemate on who is tackling climate better may be missing the point, with both sets of approaches needed.


In the run-up to a joint summit this week the United States rebuffed European Union pleas to cap its greenhouse gas emissions and price carbon in an EU-style trading scheme.

Instead the US prefers public backing for research development. It says it has invested some US$30 billion in clean energy technologies.

But a major UN report due on Friday will detail how to fight climate change, and say both tactics are needed.

Steady carbon prices over decades could "largely decarbonise power generation", it says, while adding extra government funding was "also important."

Both Europe and America are keen to nurture clean energy technologies -- so-called cleantech -- which could be worth US$500 billion annually by 2050, according to one UK study.

"We have confidence in our universities, researchers and companies," a European Commission spokeswoman said.

"We are confident that we are on the right track with a balanced mix of policy measures."

The EU argues it could be a waste of money to pay for R&D without a market for the end product. Carbon pricing can create that by penalising carbon-intensive energy sources like coal.

And at least some European businesses back the approach.

"It's impossible to make a difference if governments don't put in place a long-term carbon price," said Vincent de Rivaz, chief executive of French utility EDF.

But European industry is also worried that a high carbon price will push up energy costs and hurt its competitiveness, especially given the bloc has adopted tough unilateral emissions goals.

"It would be a nonsense if Europe got its act together, if that made itself uncompetitive with China, India and the United States," said Miles Templeman, director general of Britain's Institute of Directors.

"That's exactly where we're headed and where we can't be."


PUSH

The UN report pinpoints key unproven technologies needed to make a difference, including burying greenhouse gases underground, using so-called carbon capture and storage (CCS), or a new generation of transport fuels derived from waste.

It's game-changing technologies like these that most need R&D backing in the short-term, it says.

The US Administration has already proposed this year US$2.1 billion in loan guarantees to produce ethanol from the likes of straw and grass, and a further US$1.6 billion in research grants.

Meanwhile, Europe says it will support 10 to 12 CCS demonstration projects, and Britain announces this month the winners for CCS funding which one bidder expects to be worth 600 million pounds (US$1.20 billion).

"Making sure Europe has a slice of the action is vital," said British climate change minister Ian Pearson.

Friday's UN report will echo fears in recent studies by the International Energy Agency and British economist Nicholas Stern that the level of public investment is lagging. It will say research in energy technologies is now half 1980 levels.

The UK-sponsored Stern Review said last year such research needs to double globally to US$20 billion annually.


Story by Gerard Wynn


REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

Reuters



© 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
top

 
3 MAY 2007
ENVIRONMENT
NEWS

AUSTRALIA:
Australian Farmers Wrestle Dingo Threat

AUSTRALIA:
Australia Demands "New Kyoto" in Place of "Old"

CHINA:
Deep Tremors May Hold Key to Predicting Big Quakes

CHINA:
Forest Fire Reignites in Northeast China Mountains

FRANCE:
France Records Hottest April Since 1950

GERMANY:
Carbon Market Trebled in 2006 - World Bank

JAPAN:
Battle Brews Over Japan's Push for Ethanol Gasoline

MEXICO:
Jeans Firms Pollute Mexican City With Blue Dye

NORWAY:
Poor Nations Brake Greenhouse Gas Rise - UN Draft

SINGAPORE:
Asia Struggles to Stop Relentless "Pollution Calendar"

THAILAND:
Bangkok Faces Flooded Future, Expert Says

THAILAND:
It's Survival of the Toughest at UN Climate Talks

UK:
Carbon Tax or Carbon Market? The Jury is Out

UK:
Small, Unexciting Steps Can Make Big Climate Leap

UK:
Keen to be Green -- But at What Cost?

UK:
The Pros and Cons of Going Green in the Home

UK:
Zero-Carbon UK Houses 1/8th Dearer to Build - Report

UK:
Buyer Beware, Carbon Cuts Not Always Real

UK:
US, European Climate Change Tactics Compatible

US:
Nuclear Power No Sure Cure for Climate Ills - Groups

US:
US-Based Index Allows Bets on Global Warming Fight

US:
US Environment Satellites In Jeopardy - Scientists

US:
US Corporate Climate Plan May Need Carbon Tax Cues



previous day
today's news
next day


This site developed by Frontline, and managed by Planet Ark using RPM-NT.

Site designed by Jon Dee @ Planet Ark.

Radiant