The U.N.-sponsored agreement strikes a delicate balance between the
interests of major exporters of genetically modified crops, such as the
United States and Canada, and importers in the European Union and
developing countries, which have expressed concerns about the health and
environmental impact of the new food varieties.The agreement, which still must be ratified by 50 countries before it
goes into effect, establishes an international framework for countries
to use when making decisions about genetically modified crops.
It also requires, for the first time under an international agreement,
labeling of commodity shipments that "may contain" genetically modified
foods. But there is no specific requirement that farmers or the grain
industry segregate conventional and modified crops, which the U.S.
government said could cost billions of dollars.
"On balance, we think this is an agreement that protects the environment
without disrupting world food trade," David Sandalow, assistant U.S.
secretary of state for oceans, environment and science, told reporters.
European Commission Environmental Minister Margot Wallstrom said the
protocol, signed by more than 130 countries, was a victory for consumers
and importers and an agreement of which all countries could be proud.
The pact also won praise from both industry groups and
environmentalists, who each feared the other would have more influence
over the final outcome of a pact on genetically modified organisms, or
GMOs.
GMOs SPARK CONCERN
The term "genetically modified organisms" refers to plants and animals
containing genes transferred from other species to produce certain
characteristics, such as resistance to certain pests and herbicides.
Although any genetically modified organism planted in the United States
is subjected to U.S. government testing and approval, some groups feared
the new varieties could have adverse environmental and health effects.
Many EU consumers, suspicious of genetically engineered crops, favoured
blocking their importation.
To reach an agreement, the United States and Canada had to accept
stronger language than they wanted recognising the right of countries to
use precautions in making import decisions.
With its language on the "precautionary principle," the proposed
Biosafety Protocol agreement could set the stage for countries to close
their markets to genetically modified crops without conclusive
scientific evidence of harm.
At the same time, the agreement also contains a "savings clause," which
emphasises the new pact does not override rights and obligations under
other international agreements, including the World Trade Organisation
(WTO).
The United States, which negotiated along with Canada as part of the
Miami Group bloc and therefore does not need congressional approval of
the pact, insisted on that language to ensure science-based WTO rules
would still apply to import decisions.
If a dispute arises over a country's decision to close its market to a
food product, the WTO will review the protocol before making a ruling,
Wallstrom said.
U.S. Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs Frank Loy acknowledged
the pact had some shortcomings from the U.S. point of view. "Make no
mistake. The agreement is not perfect," Loy said.
LABELING WOULD BE NEGOTIATED
Once the protocol goes into effect, which could take two or three years,
commodity shipments that may contain GMOs will have to be labeled "may
contain" genetically modified organisms.
At that point, a new round of negotiations on more specific labeling
requirements will also have to begin, with the requirement of finishing
in two years.
Willy De Greef, director of regulatory and government affairs for
Novartis, a Swiss-based company that produces genetically modified corn
varieties, said the grain industry is already moving toward segregation.
"What we needed was a framework" and the protocol provides