On a 243-177 vote, the House stripped language that would have barred the
president from proclaiming national monuments and cut off funds to manage the
nine monuments Clinton has designated this year.These include tracts of ancient trees near Tucson, Arizona, the last pristine
stretch of the Columbia River in Washington state, and scenic Western canyons.
The House also voted to drop language that would have stalled an environmental
management programme for the Pacific Northwest's Columbia River basin, removing
another sticking point in a $14.6 billion bill for public lands and cultural
programmes that Clinton has threatened to veto.
The White House still had objections to the lands bill that it says shortchanges
efforts to buy more park lands and cuts support for arts and humanities
programmes.
The House was expected to complete work on the bill later on Thursday, one of the
13 annual spending measures Congress must pass to fund the government next fiscal
year starting Oct. 1.
The bill would have blocked funds to manage nine national monuments on federal
lands that Clinton has proclaimed. The president's action shielded some 2 million
acres (800,000 hectares) from mining, logging and other activities under the 1906
Antiquities Act.
Western Republicans blasted Clinton for putting vast tracts of land in their
states off limits to economic uses, saying he was misapplying the Antiquities Act
that was intended to protect culturally important places instead of large areas.
"The administration is engaging in the biggest land grab since the invasion of
Poland," said Representative Helen Chenoweth-Gage, an Idaho Republican.
They also accused Clinton of using the programme to provide scenic backdrops for
politically motivated news conferences, and said the Constitution makes Congress,
not the president, responsible for determining uses of public lands.
"All of the flannel shirts and blues jeans cannot obscure the nakedness of a
president bereft of the constitutional covering," said Representative Bob
Schaffer, a Colorado Republican.
But Democrats, joined by a number of moderate Republicans, said the Antiquities
Act was needed to protect for future generations beautiful lands that are home to
rare wildlife.
"The way it was, we were cutting the Sequoias. That is why the president took
this action. This is a gift to our nation," Representative George Miller, a
California Democrat, said of Clinton's move to protect the Giant Sequoia redwoods
of northern California.